AUTHOR'S NOTE: In retrospect, I probably should have titled this essay "Saving Tarot from Psychology" as mentioned in the last paragraph, but I decided to let the original title stand as more representative of the overall thrust. More to the point, I already have an earlier essay with that title. I'm greatly amused (I used … Continue reading The Long Shadow of Jung
Tarot Opinion
Tarot Taboos
This subject comes along with some regularity on the tarot forums and social-media pages, especially among new readers: "What topics can't (or shouldn't) we attempt to read with the cards?" My personal opinion is that almost any matter is fair game as long as the question is worded with finesse (although I do draw the … Continue reading Tarot Taboos
The “Wrong Answer” Dilemma
Lately I've been frequenting the "r/tarot" sub-reddit forum since it is one of the more active public tarot platforms. What caught my eye is the regular appearance of posts that express dismay over the incorrect results of self-reading: "Why did the cards tell me this when exactly the opposite happened?" Most of these observations come … Continue reading The “Wrong Answer” Dilemma
The “Good” Beginner’s Tarot Deck
Novice tarot readers frequently ask online which deck would be good as a first-time buy. I've written several detailed essays on this subject in the past, but thought a "punchlist" format might be useful in answering this question. So here is my abbreviated overview of what, at least for me, makes a "good" tarot deck. … Continue reading The “Good” Beginner’s Tarot Deck
Tone vs. Substance: “Soft Focus” and the Art of Simplification
Sometimes (well, actually, more often than not) I think people just starting into the practice of tarot reading expect far too much from it in the way of precision. I was talking to a frustrated individual online who admitted to being extremely analytical and receiving little encouragement from the persistent lack of congruity between his … Continue reading Tone vs. Substance: “Soft Focus” and the Art of Simplification
“Adjectivitis” – The Tarot Writer’s (and Reader’s) Albatross
I have to confess that the comma is my enemy, particularly when it is used to link an endless array of modifiers that would be best boiled down into a single compelling noun or trenchant adjective (for that matter, the more sophisticated semi-colon is at most a "friend with benefits" and not a faithful consort … Continue reading “Adjectivitis” – The Tarot Writer’s (and Reader’s) Albatross
Tarot as “Projection”
There is a common belief among those who dismiss tarot reading as a naive exercise in self-deception that the results are merely a fanciful "projection" of the seeker's fondest dreams or deepest fears, and that the agency of the cards cannot reliably come up with unbiased testimony about future circumstances. In my opinion, this argument … Continue reading Tarot as “Projection”
The “Science” of Tarot
Aleister Crowley said he pursued the "Aim of Religion" (by which I assume he meant spiritual enlightenment and not sacerdotal hegemony) using the "Method of Science" (he was clearly enamored of the scientific advances of his time, and much of the latter is on display in the Book of Thoth). Those tarot readers who don't … Continue reading The “Science” of Tarot
Where Have All the Masters Gone?
Folk singer Pete Seeger once wrote a poignant song titled "Where Have All the Flowers Gone?" that lamented the transitory flowering and fading of youth and also, obliquely, the folly of war. In contemplating the unfortunate demise of the stimulating forum that was Aeclectic Tarot in 2017, I often wonder where the council of highly … Continue reading Where Have All the Masters Gone?
“Reading by Intention”
There is a common belief that "good intentions" are all that is necessary to obtain constructive insights from a tarot reading. Learning and experience are optional as long as the reader's heart is in the right place, a manifestation of what I think of as the "It's all good" mode of prophecy in which no … Continue reading “Reading by Intention”