Why I Do It

. . . create complex and challenging tarot spreads, that is. In general, when reading the cards I prefer five-to-ten-card arrays that have explicit milestones or "signposts" for interpretation (aka step-wise position meanings), and an orderly, sensible progression between them (my "tweaked" version of the Celtic Cross is the best example of this: https://parsifalswheeldivination.wordpress.com/2017/08/02/parsifals-wheel-a-celtic-cross-variation/ ). … Continue reading Why I Do It

In Defense of Positional Tarot Spreads

I often wonder why there is such vehement opposition in modern tarot circles to the use of formal tarot spreads (those with defined positional meanings). It seems that self-styled "intuitive" readers feel stifled by any hint of structure and simply want to free-wheel their way through a reading using mystical "received" knowledge. It may be … Continue reading In Defense of Positional Tarot Spreads

Is the Practice of Divination Irrelevant or Dishonest?

As I continue to explore the sketchy written history of the early tarot, I frequently encounter the observation that the tarot cards, prior to the appearance of Jean-Baptiste Alliette (aka "Etteilla") as their original occult proponent in mid-18th-Century France, were not used in the practice of fortune-telling (presently dignified with the term "divination"); instead, they … Continue reading Is the Practice of Divination Irrelevant or Dishonest?

TURN OFF THE CAPS! (Majors-Only Tarot Reading)

It seems to be popular in Europe to read with only the 22 trump cards and leave the pip and court cards aside. This is surely a pre-20th-Century form of cartomancy that antedates the lofty assumptions of Jungian thought and its psychological archetypes. I'm not familiar enough with Joseph Campbell to say so conclusively, but … Continue reading TURN OFF THE CAPS! (Majors-Only Tarot Reading)