I often wonder why there is such vehement opposition in modern tarot circles to the use of formal tarot spreads (those with defined positional meanings). It seems that self-styled "intuitive" readers feel stifled by any hint of structure and simply want to free-wheel their way through a reading using mystical "received" knowledge. It may be … Continue reading In Defense of Positional Tarot Spreads
Tarot Opinion
Is the Practice of Divination Irrelevant or Dishonest?
As I continue to explore the sketchy written history of the early tarot, I frequently encounter the observation that the tarot cards, prior to the appearance of Jean-Baptiste Alliette (aka "Etteilla") as their original occult proponent in mid-18th-Century France, were not used in the practice of fortune-telling (presently dignified with the term "divination"); instead, they … Continue reading Is the Practice of Divination Irrelevant or Dishonest?
The Threshold of Effectiveness
AUTHOR'S NOTE: This isn't a new topic for me, but I think it deserves revisiting given the ongoing influx of younger people into the art who may not be well-served by the current "anything goes" mentality among some modern tarot writers and practitioners. Having worked with the tarot for almost 50 years now, I've come … Continue reading The Threshold of Effectiveness
Garbage In, Garbage Out
This is likely to be a controversial subject. There is an old tenet from computer science that goes: "Garbage in, garbage out (GIGO) is the concept that flawed, or nonsense input data produces nonsense output or 'garbage.' The principle also applies more generally to all analysis and logic, in that arguments are unsound if their … Continue reading Garbage In, Garbage Out
The Virtue of Simplicity
As time goes on I find myself drawn more and more to working with only the 56 Minor Arcana cards in divination. Granted, the 22 Major Arcana are where most of the philosophical "meat" lies in the tarot, but very few of my readings rise to that level of metaphysical complexity and intensity. Most of … Continue reading The Virtue of Simplicity
TURN OFF THE CAPS! (Majors-Only Tarot Reading)
It seems to be popular in Europe to read with only the 22 trump cards and leave the pip and court cards aside. This is surely a pre-20th-Century form of cartomancy that antedates the lofty assumptions of Jungian thought and its psychological archetypes. I'm not familiar enough with Joseph Campbell to say so conclusively, but … Continue reading TURN OFF THE CAPS! (Majors-Only Tarot Reading)
Spiritual Realism and Fuzzy Logic
In keeping with my life-long aversion to the "father-knows-best" model of authoritarian determinism, I tend to avoid "isms" of any kind. But in contemplating my approach to spiritual matters in general, I was casting around for a definition that does the same thing for me that "scientific materialism" does for the pure rationalist. I consider … Continue reading Spiritual Realism and Fuzzy Logic
Jungian Typology and the Four Elements
Twentieth Century psychologist Carl Gustav Jung subdivided the discriminating faculties of the human personality into four general "types:" sensation (encounters with the physical world that trigger our five bodily receptors); thinking (the intellectual function by which we process the evidence of our senses); feeling (the emotional ways in which we do the same thing); and … Continue reading Jungian Typology and the Four Elements
The “Boss from Hell” – A Riff on Mastery
I've never been satisfied with the accepted notion that the 3 of Pentacles represents the "master craftsman" while the 8 of Pentacles shows an "apprentice." The number Three appears early in the numerical sequence and is therefore relatively undeveloped; in the suit of Earth it portrays a golden opportunity to "learn the ropes" but not … Continue reading The “Boss from Hell” – A Riff on Mastery
A Force Too Short (or Is It Too Long?)
Another curious phrase used by the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn describes the 8 of Swords as the "Lord of Shortened Force." To me, "shortened" implies too little of something, but in Liber T Macgregor Mathers had this to say: “Too much force applied to small things." I just can't see it in that … Continue reading A Force Too Short (or Is It Too Long?)