Dropping the Masks: A Shared-Dynamic Relationship Spread

AUTHOR'S NOTE: It's been a while since I created a comprehensive relationship spread. Here is one that shows the shared dynamic that can bring two parties together but also drive them apart. It sets up two "personality profiles" for the purpose of comparison, followed by a central pair that describes converging and diverging interests between … Continue reading Dropping the Masks: A Shared-Dynamic Relationship Spread

No Man’s Land: Thoughts on the Astral Plane

AUTHOR'S NOTE: I've been reading about the work of Chalcidius, the 4th-Century CE Christian translator and commentator on Plato's Timaeus who, along with his 12th-Century interpreter, French theologian Alain de Lille (Alanus ab Insulis), subscribed to Plato's "Principle of the Triad" in concluding that God does not engage directly with Man, but solely through invisible … Continue reading No Man’s Land: Thoughts on the Astral Plane

The Twos and the Principle of the Triad

AUTHOR'S NOTE: In yesterday's post I used a quote from Plato's Timaeus that has a bearing on how I interpret the tarot Twos. In any reading involving two parties, there are generally three factions that must be accommodated: the two individuals or collective entities and the relationship between them, which will sometimes take on a … Continue reading The Twos and the Principle of the Triad

Deep Fake: Everything, Something or Nothing?

"Everything is not a subject about which anything of much interest can be said." - C.S. Lewis, in contemplating "a deity really believed in who, by being all things, is almost nothing." AUTHOR"S NOTE: I've been engaged in a stimulating conversation in the online r/tarot community regarding the topic "When we ask a question of … Continue reading Deep Fake: Everything, Something or Nothing?